Non-operative management of humeral periprosthetic fracture after stemless shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic fractures around a stemless implant often involve lesser and greater tuberosities with a well-fixed implant in the metaphysis. This exposes the surgeon to unique questions and challenges as no surgical option (open reduction and internal fixation or revision to a stem) appears satisfactory to address them. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes after non-operative management of periprosthetic fractures after stemless shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted to identify all patients who had sustained non-operative management of a periprosthetic fracture after a stemless shoulder. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) intraoperative fractures and (2) implant loosening. Primary outcomes included mean Constant score and mean active range of motion. Secondary outcomes were VAS, radiological analysis, and complications. RESULTS: Nine patients were included. One was excluded due to the loss of follow-up at three months. Mean age was 79 years. At the last follow-up, no significant difference was observed between the Constant score, VAS, or the range of motion before fracture and at the last follow-up. Fracture healing did not result in any change in angulation in the frontal plane in seven cases and was responsible for a varus malunion in two cases of anatomic arthroplasty. No change in lateralization or distalization was reported. No cases of implant loosening after fracture have been observed. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management seems to be appropriate in cases of minimally displaced fractures without implant loosening.

Outcomes of Humerus Nonunion Surgery in Patients With Initial Operative Fracture Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: To describe outcomes following humerus aseptic nonunion surgery in patients whose initial fracture was treated operatively and to identify risk factors for nonunion surgery failure in the same population. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Eight, academic, level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients with aseptic humerus nonunion (OTA/AO 11 and 12) after the initial operative management between 1998 and 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Success rate of nonunion surgery. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included (56% female; median age 50 years; mean follow-up 21.2 months). Of 90 aseptic humerus nonunions, 71 (78.9%) united following nonunion surgery. Thirty patients (33.3%) experienced 1 or more postoperative complications, including infection, failure of fixation, and readmission. Multivariate analysis found that not performing revision internal fixation during nonunion surgery (n = 8; P = 0.002) and postoperative de novo infection (n = 9; P = 0.005) were associated with an increased risk of recalcitrant nonunion. Patient smoking status and the use of bone graft were not associated with differences in the nonunion repair success rate. CONCLUSIONS: This series of previously operated aseptic humerus nonunions found that more than 1 in 5 patients failed nonunion repair. De novo postoperative infection and failure to perform revision internal fixation during nonunion surgery were associated with recalcitrant nonunion. Smoking and use of bone graft did not influence the success rate of nonunion surgery. These findings can be used to give patients a realistic expectation of results and complications following humerus nonunion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

K-wire versus screws in the fixation of lateral condyle fracture of humerus in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lateral condyle fracture of the humerus is the second most common elbow fracture in children. Non-displaced lateral condyle fractures can often be managed with cast and conservative care, while reduction and fixation are often used to treat displaced lateral condyle fractures. Traditionally, K-wire fixation has been used for displaced lateral condyle fractures, but recently fixation using screws has been advocated in some studies. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the difference in outcomes and complications between the two different fixation methods for the treatment of displaced lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in pediatric patients. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for this review. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were used for study selection. Studies comparing K-wires and screw fixation in displaced lateral condyle fractures in pediatric patients were included. Clinical outcomes using the Hardacre criteria, infection, limitation of range of motion of the elbow, lateral condyle overgrowth, delayed union, nonunion, and avascular necrosis were compared. Data were analyzed using the meta package in R version 4.2.2, and random-effects or fixed-effects models were used according to heterogeneity. RESULTS: One randomized controlled study and three retrospective cohort studies were included, with a total of 240 patients (K-wire:118, screw:122). The clinical outcome using the Hardacre criteria was not different between the groups (P = 0.54), but the risk of infection (risk ratio [RR] = 5.52, 95% CI: 1.42-21.48, P = 0.01) and limitation of range of motion (RR = 3.75, 95% CI: 1.54-9.18, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the K-wire fixation group than in screw fixation group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of screws for fixation after reduction in the treatment of lateral condyle fracture of the humerus in children decreases the risk of superficial infection and elbow stiffness compared with the use of K-wire. Although removal of the implant under general anesthesia is necessary, screw fixation can be considered in displaced lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023415643).

Humeral Fracture in a Female Arm Wrestler: A Patient-Centered Focused Review.

Humeral fractures in arm wrestling are rarely reported entities in the orthopedic literature and can present with significant pain and debilitation. These injuries are even more uncommon in female practitioners of the sport. Rotational forces applied to the humerus during competition can result in the transmission of stress into the distal part of the humerus, thereby causing a spiral fracture. Common complications that can arise from such an injury can include radial nerve palsy and butterfly fragments of the humerus. These can occur in arm wrestling and can present with prominent pain, weakness, and functional impairment. Treatment often varies according to the presenting case and are often operative in cases with displaced fractures, and non-operative in those of nondisplaced fractures. Prognostic outcomes are often favorable and uneventful. In this article, we explore a distal humeral fracture in a female arm wrestler and discuss the mechanism, presentation, and management of such an injury, based on a thorough yet concise review of literature.

Allografts are not necessary for displaced proximal humeral fractures in patients less than 65 years old, a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Displaced proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are frequently treated with locking plates to achieve osteosynthesis. Bone grafts are used as augmentation techniques to improve stability in osteoporotic patients. However, there has been little research into whether bone grafts are necessary for patients younger than 65 years old. This study compared radiographic and clinical outcomes between PHFs augmented with bone grafts or not in a younger population. METHODS: Between January 2016 and June 2020, 91 patients treated with a locking plate alone (LP), and 101 patients treated with locking plates augmented with bone grafts (BG) were analyzed. Potential confounding factors for outcomes were adjusted by propensity score-matching analyses. For the retrospective cohort study, 62 patients from each group were evaluated for radiographic outcomes and clinical outcomes and compared. RESULTS: Sixth-two patients in each group, both with a mean age of 52 years old, were with a mean follow-up time of 25 months in the LP group and 26 months in the BG group. There was no difference in demographic or surgical characteristics between the two groups after propensity score-matching. With regard to radiographic outcomes, the changes in neck-shaft angle (-5.1 ± 4.9 vs. -3.1 ± 5.3, p = 0.015) and humeral head height (-1.5 ± 2.5 vs. -0.4 ± 2.7, p = 0.002) were more obvious in the BG group. However, regarding functional outcomes, there were no significant differences between the two groups in DASH score, Constant-Murley score, or VAS score. Moreover, the complication rate was not significantly different between two groups. DISCUSSION: Allografts only provide minor improvements of stability in radiography for patients less than 65 years old after locking plate fixation of PHFs, but don't improve shoulder function, relieve pain or reduce complications. We concluded that allografts are unnecessary for younger patients with displaced PHFs.

Dual-Plate Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures With Unstable Medial Column in Patients With Osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare radiological and clinical outcomes between lateral locking plate (LLP) and dual-plate fixation (LLP and additional medial buttress plate) for proximal humerus fractures with medial column comminution and varus deformity in patients with osteoporosis. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 52 patients were enrolled. Of these, 26 patients underwent dual-plate fixation. The control group (LLP) was matched to the dual-plate group for age, sex, injured side, and fracture type. INTERVENTION: Patients in the dual-plate group were treated with LLP and medial buttress plate, whereas patients in the LLP group were treated with only an LLP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Demographic factors, operative time, and level of hemoglobin of the 2 groups obtained from medical records. Changes in the neck-shaft angle and the development of postoperative complications were recorded. Clinical outcomes were measured based on the visual analog scale; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; and Constant-Murley scores. RESULTS: The operation time and hemoglobin loss did not differ significantly between the groups. Radiographic evaluation showed a significantly lower change in neck-shaft angle in the dual-=plate group than in the LLP group. The dual-plate group also showed better Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; and Constant-Murley scores than the LLP group. CONCLUSION: Fixation using additional medial buttress plate with LLP may be considered for treating proximal humerus fractures in patients with an unstable medial column, varus deformity, and osteoporosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

High rate of avascular necrosis but excellent patient-reported outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fracture dislocations: should ORIF be considered as primary treatment?

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fracture dislocations, excluding 2-part greater tuberosity fracture dislocations, are rare injuries. Outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of these injuries have not been well described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report the radiographic and functional outcomes of patients who underwent ORIF of a proximal humerus fracture dislocation. METHODS: All skeletally mature patients who underwent ORIF of a proximal humerus fracture dislocation between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Patients with isolated greater tuberosity fracture dislocations were excluded. The primary outcome was American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score at a minimum of 2 years. Secondary outcomes were the development of avascular necrosis (AVN) and reoperation rate. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 45 years (standard deviation 16), and 77% were men. Median time to reduction and surgery was 1 day (interquartile range [IQR] 1-5). There were 2 (8%) Neer 2-part fractures, 7 (27%) 3-part, and 17 (65%) 4-part fractures. Fifty-four percent (54%) involved the anatomic neck and 31% included a head-split component. Thirty-nine percent (39%) were anterior dislocations. The rate of AVN was 19%. The reoperation rate was 15%. Reoperations included removal of hardware (2), subscapularis repair (1), and manipulation under anesthesia (1). No patients went on to arthroplasty. ASES scores were available for 22 patients (84%) including 4 of 5 patients with AVN. The median ASES score at a mean of 6.0 years postoperatively was 98.3 (IQR 86.7-100, range 63.3-100) and was not different in those with or without AVN (median 98.3 vs. 92.0, P = .175). Only the presence of medial comminution and nonanatomic head shaft alignment on postoperative radiographs were associated with increased risk of AVN. CONCLUSION: Radiographic rates of AVN (19%) and reoperation (15%) were high in this series of patients undergoing ORIF of proximal humerus fracture dislocations. Despite this, none of the patients required arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at an average of 6 years postinjury were excellent, with a median ASES score of 98.5. ORIF should be considered as primary method of treatment in proximal humerus fracture dislocations not only in young patients but also middle-aged patients.

Understanding risk for early dislocation resulting in reoperation within 90 days of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: extreme rare event detection through cost-sensitive machine learning.

BACKGROUND: Reliable prediction of postoperative dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) would inform patient counseling as well as surgical and postoperative decision making. Understanding interactions between multiple risk factors is important to identify those patients most at risk of this rare but costly complication. To better understand these interactions, a game theory-based approach was undertaken to develop machine learning models capable of predicting dislocation-related 90-day readmission following RSA. MATERIAL & METHODS: A retrospective review of the Nationwide Readmissions Database was performed to identify patients who underwent RSA between 2016 and 2018 with a subsequent readmission for prosthetic dislocation. Of the 74,697 index procedures included in the data set, 740 (1%) experienced a dislocation resulting in hospital readmission within 90 days. Five machine learning algorithms were evaluated for their ability to predict dislocation leading to hospital readmission within 90 days of RSA. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values were calculated for the top-performing models to quantify the importance of features and understand variable interaction effects, with hierarchical clustering used to identify cohorts of patients with similar risk factor combinations. RESULTS: Of the 5 models evaluated, the extreme gradient boosting algorithm was the most reliable in predicting dislocation (C statistic = 0.71, F2 score = 0.07, recall = 0.84, Brier score = 0.21). SHAP value analysis revealed multifactorial explanations for dislocation risk, with presence of a preoperative humerus fracture; disposition involving discharge or transfer to a skilled nursing facility, intermediate care facility, or other nonroutine facility; and Medicaid as the expected primary payer resulting in strong, positive, and unidirectional effects on increasing dislocation risk. In contrast, factors such as comorbidity burden, index procedure complexity and duration, age, sex, and presence or absence of preoperative glenohumeral osteoarthritis displayed bidirectional influences on risk, indicating potential protective effects for these variables and opportunities for risk mitigation. Hierarchical clustering using SHAP values identified patients with similar risk factor combinations. CONCLUSION: Machine learning can reliably predict patients at risk for postoperative dislocation resulting in hospital readmission within 90 days of RSA. Although individual risk for dislocation varies significantly based on unique combinations of patient characteristics, SHAP analysis revealed a particularly at-risk cohort consisting of young, male patients with high comorbidity burdens who are indicated for RSA after a humerus fracture. These patients may require additional modifications in postoperative activity, physical therapy, and counseling on risk-reducing measures to prevent early dislocation after RSA.

Periprosthetic humeral fracture revision using a massive allograft in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: A case report.

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a surgical option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Periprosthetic fractures during and after TEA are one of the most common causes of reoperation. Fractures around the stem of a loose prosthesis with associated bone loss are the most technically challenging to treat. Previous reports have demonstrated that the use of massive allografts is a reasonable alternative in salvage situations. Here, we report the case of a 78-year-old woman with RA who underwent revision TEA using massive allografts with modifications to the methods described in previous reports. She suffered a right periprosthetic humeral fracture 5 years after primary TEA, with a fracture in the proximal humeral diaphysis and a long spiral fracture in the diaphysis. The fracture around the stem of a loose prosthesis was associated with bone loss. We performed revision TEA using an allograft of the proximal femoral diaphysis. In contrast to previous reports, we preserved part of the humeral diaphysis, which was thin due to osteolysis, without removal. The advantage of this approach was that it preserved attachments, such as the deltoid and brachioradialis muscles. The patient had good elbow function and minimal pain without adverse events at 1 year postoperatively. Our findings suggest that preserving part of a thinned humeral diaphysis is a reasonable option in revision TEA with a massive composite allograft.

Functional results and unfavorable events after treatment of proximal humerus fractures using a new locking plate system.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures are often treated with a fixed-angle titanium plate osteosynthesis. Recently, plates made of alternative materials such as carbon fibre-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) have been introduced. This study presents the postoperative results of patients treated with a CFR-PEEK plate. METHODS: Patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with a CFR-PEEK plate (PEEKPower™ Humeral Fracture Plate (HFP)) were included. In follow-up examination, age and gender adjusted Constant-Murley Score (ACS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QDASH) and pain score (Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) were analyzed. General condition at follow-up was measured by European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L). Range of motion was recorded. In addition, radiographs at follow-up, unfavorable events and revision rate were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 98 patients (66.0 ± 13.2 years, 74 females, 24 males) were reexamined. Mean follow-up was 27.6 ± 13.2 months. There were 15 2-part, 28 3-part and 55 4-part fractures. The functional scores showed good results: SSV 83.3 ± 15.6%, QDASH 13.1 ± 17.0 and ACS 80.4 ± 16.0. A 4-part-fracture, head split component, nonanatomic head shaft reposition and preoperative radiological signs of osteoarthritis were significant negative predictors for poorer clinical scores. Unfavourable events were observed in 27 patients (27.6%). Revision surgery was performed in 8 (8.2%) patients. Risk factors for an unfavourable event were female gender, age of 50 years and older, diabetes, affected dominant hand, 4-part fracture, head split and preoperative radiological signs of osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: There are several advantages of the CFR-PEEK plate (PEEKPower™ Humeral Fracture Plate (HFP)) such as the polyaxial screw placement and higher stability of locking screws. In summary, the CFR-PEEK plate osteosynthesis is a good alternative with comparable clinical results and some biomechanical advantages. Proximal humerus fractures show good clinical results after treatment with a CFR-PEEK plate. The revision rate and the risk of unfavorable events are not increased compared to conventional titanium plate osteosynthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Combined Humeral Head and Shaft Fractures: Outcome Following Intramedullary Nailing and Plating.

Background and Objectives: Combined fractures of the humeral head and shaft (FHS) are rare but frequently involve an intermuscular fracture as its characteristic pattern. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate intramedullary nailed and plated FHS in terms of outcomes and complications. Materials and Methods: The present study included patients with FHS, treated via either intramedullary nailing or plating within a period of 10 years, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Functional outcome was assessed using the age- and sex-adapted Constant-Murley Score (CMS-K). Rates of complications and revision surgeries were registered. Results: Twenty-five patients (18 females, 7 males, age 60.1 ± 14.2 years, range 23-76 years) were included in the study. Nailing was performed in 16 patients (12 females, 4 males, age 62.6 ± 12.4 years), whereas plating was executed in nine patients (6 females, 3 males, age 55.8 ± 17.0 years). Follow-up among all patients was 45.1 ± 26.3 months (range 12-97 months). CMS-K was 70.3 ± 32.3 in the nailing group, with reoperation in four cases, and 76.0 ± 31.0 in the plating group, with one reoperation (p = 0.42). Patients with no metaphyseal fragment displacement (n = 19; CMS-K 76.7 ± 17.3) demonstrated significantly better functional outcomes versus those with secondary displacement of the metaphyseal fragments (n = 6; CMS-K 60.0 ± 17.1), p = 0.046. Conclusions: Comparable acceptable clinical outcome is obtained when comparing nailing with additional open cerclage or lag-screw fixation techniques versus plating with open reduction. However, a higher revision rate was observed after nailing. The correct metaphyseal fragment fixation seems to be crucial to avoid loss of reduction and hence the need for revision surgery, as well as a worse outcome.

Is early mobilization a viable option after intramedullary nailing of 4-parts proximal humerus fractures?

INTRODUCTION: After centromedullary nailing (CMN) of 4-parts (4P) cephalo-tuberositary fractures of the proximal humerus (PH), shoulder immobilization for a few weeks is usual, although no scientific justification does support this attitude, nor the duration of immobilization. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of early mobilization after CMN of PH 4P fractures on clinical, radiological outcomes and complication rates. The hypothesis was that early mobilization would not lead to a deterioration in results or an increase in the complication rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients operated on for a 4P-PH fracture by CMN in our institution between 2010 and 2018 were included retrospectively. 2 groups were formed according to the duration of post-operative immobilization of the shoulder: 0-2 weeks (group A) and 3-6 weeks (group B). All patients had a clinical examination (Range of motion ROM and Constant score) and X-rays of the shoulder at least 24 months of follow-up. 58 patients (average age 66 years (39-89)) were included, with 25 in group A and 33 in group B. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 38.5 (24-73) months. The active ROM at the last follow-up was: active anterior elevation 149° (80°-180°) in group A versus 134 (60°-180°) in group B (p = 0.099); active external rotation 145° (15°-70°) in group A versus 42° (15-70°) in group B (p = 0.6). The Absolute Mean Constant score was 78.29 for Group A (45-100) versus 68.59 points (45-96) for Group B (p = 0.065). Regarding complications: in group A, we found 2 retractile capsulitis, 2 pseudarthrosis and 2 osteonecrosis of the humeral head. In group B, we found 5 retractile capsulitis, 1 infection of the surgical site, 3 osteonecrosis of the humeral head and 1 pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSION: Early mobilization after CMN of 4P-PH fractures did not lead to an increase in the complications rate and in particular secondary displacements or osteonecrosis. There was a trend toward improved clinical outcomes with early mobilization, although this trend was not statistically significant. EVIDENCE LEVEL: IV, retrospective study.

Supracondylar humeral fractures and lateral elbow condyle fractures in children: association between body weight, clinical signs, and fracture severity.

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to investigate the association between body weight, clinical signs and surgical time, and the severity of elbow fractures sustained exclusively by a ground-level fall in children. METHODS: Patients aged 2-11 years with elbow fracture caused exclusively by a ground-level fall were included. BMI was plotted on the sex-specific BMI-for-age percentile growth chart to obtain the BMI percentile. The elbow fractures were classified according to Gartland Classification for supracondylar fractures and the Song Classification for lateral humeral condyle fracture. Our main outcome measurement was Body Mass Index and fracture severity according Gartland or Song classifications. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients with elbow fractures were included in this study. The mean age of total population was 5.4 years (±2.4). The majority of our patients were male (61.7%), nearly of 48% were overweight or obese patients. The ecchymosis and puckering were the clinical sign more frequent in more severe fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Our data presented did not observe a direct relation between obesity and the severity of elbow humeral fractures in the pediatric population with a ground-level fall.

Short-term Clinical Outcome of Dual Plate Fixation in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures with Calcar Comminution.

OBJECTIVE: Calcar comminution has been considered to be the main cause of the failure of internal fixation and fracture nonunion in proximal humerus surgery. Anatomical reduction and increasing the strength of internal fixation is the key to success. The purpose of this study was to investigate the short-term clinical effect of dual plate fixation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with calcar comminution. METHODS: The data of 37 patients with proximal humeral fractures with calcar comminution, treated in our departments from July 2018 to April 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were treated with anterior plate and lateral PHILOS plate, and followed up for more than 12 months, including 25 cases in Tianjin Hospital and 12 cases in Shanghai General Hospital. The patients included 12 males and 25 females, their age was 54.89 ± 13.59 years (range from 32-79 years), and 21 patients had dominant hand injury. According to the Neer classification, there were 11 two-part fractures, 22 three-part fractures, and four four-part fractures. The range of motion of the shoulder joint, visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Constant-Murley shoulder score, neck-shaft angle, anterior-posterior angle, and other complication scores were recorded at the last follow-up. RESULTS: All 37 patients were followed up after operation, and the follow-up time was 21.81 ± 7.35 months (range from 12-36 months). The fractures of all 37 patients had healed at the last follow-up visit. The neck-shaft angle measured immediately after operation was 132.59° ± 8.34°, and the neck-shaft angle measured at the last follow-up visit was 132.38 ± 8.53°. The anterior-posterior angle measured immediately after surgery was 3.45° ± 0.81°, and the anterior-posterior angle at the last follow-up visit was 3.66° ± 0.77°. The range of motion of the shoulder joint was as follows: the shoulder joint could be forward elevated by 158.11° ± 13.09° (range: 140°-180°), rotated externally by 38.38° ± 7.55° (range: 20°-45°), and internally rotated to T4-L4 level. The VAS score was 0.46 ± 0.87 (range: 0-3), the ASES was 86.58 ± 8.79 (range: 56.7-100), and the Constant-Murley score was 88.76 ± 8.25 (range: 60-100). Thirty-three cases were excellent, and four cases were good. No obvious complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The combination of anterior plate and lateral PHILOS plate in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with calcar comminution can achieve stable fixation, and the postoperative clinical and imaging outcome was satisfactory. Firstly, the anterior plate can provide temporary stability when the Kirschner wires are removed, which can provide space for lateral plate placement during fracture reduction and fixation. Secondly, additional support by the anterior plate can provide higher stability in complex fractures with calcar comminution.

Fixation of humerus shaft fractures in polytrauma patients does not improve short-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Surgical fixation of humeral shaft fractures is widely considered a relative indication for polytraumatized patients to improve mobility and expedite care. This study aimed to determine whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures improves short term outcomes in polytrauma (PT] patients. METHODS: Using the National Trauma Data Bank, PT patients with humeral shaft fractures were identified from 2010-2015. Three PT groups were analyzed: Group 1 - PT with nonoperative humeral shaft fracture, Group 2 - PT with humeral fixation on Day 1, and Group 3 - PT with humeral fixation on Day 2+. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare discharge timing and days on ventilator and in ICU between the three groups. RESULTS: There were 395 patients in Group 1, 1,346 in Group 2, and 1,318 in Group 3. There were no differences between the three groups when comparing Glasgow Coma Scale (p=0.3]; however, Injury Severity Score and Abbreviated Injury Scale were statistically different (p<0.001]. No differences were found in ICU or ventilator days between the three groups (p=0.2, p=0.5]. For Length of Stay, no difference was observed in Group 1 vs. Group 2 and Group 2 vs. Group 3. However, non-surgical patients were discharged 20% faster than those with Day 1 surgery (p=0.005]. Open fractures were treated one day earlier than closed fractures but discharged one day later (p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: This NTDB study demonstrates no differences in length of stay, days in the ICU or on the ventilator in patients with humeral shaft fractures treated non-operatively versus operative fixation. Overall, 44%-58% in all 3 groups had an ISS ≥ 14. Based on these results, we assert that fixation of the humeral shaft provides no short-term benefits in the multiply injured patient.

Which pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures are high risk for conversion to open reduction?

Supracondylar humerus fractures are common pediatric injuries encountered by orthopedic surgeons. Displaced fractures are treated operatively with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or open reduction of injuries that cannot be adequately closed reduced. The purpose of this study is to identify preoperative injury characteristics associated with open reduction. Retrospective chart review was performed on all AO type 13A (Gartland type) supracondylar humerus fractures in patients 2-13 years old treated surgically at a single level 1 trauma center over 6 years. Preoperative demographics and radiographic parameters were obtained for all patients. Primary outcomes were closed reduction or conversion to open reduction of fractures prior to k-wire fixation. Initial bivariate analysis was done using Chi-square tests. Final multivariate analysis with Bonferonni correction was performed using a backward, stepwise regression model including potential predictor variables identified in the bivariate analysis. A total of 211 patients received surgical treatment and 18 of those patients (8.5%) failed closed reduction and underwent open reduction. Final multivariate analysis demonstrated that only flexion type [relative risk (RR), 10.2] and coronal displacement more than 7 mm (RR, 4.49) were significant preoperative factors for conversion to open reduction. Patients with significant coronal displacement and flexion-type injuries are markers of challenging reduction and are at high risk for conversion to open reduction.

Nonunion of humeral medial condyle fracture caused by excessive functional exercise: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Medial epicondyle fractures are one of the more common humerus fractures, but humeral medial condyle fracture (HMCF) is rare. Nonunion of medial humeral condyle fractures due to functional exercise is less common. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 5-year-old patient with a nonunion HMCF due to excessive functional exercise, who bruised the elbow 1 year ago and had no positive findings on all imaging studies. On this physical examination, there was a snapping and palpable lump in the elbow joint during movement, but the patient did not feel any discomfort and the range of motion of the joint was normal. X rays and computed tomography (CT) showed that the left HMCF was discontinuous, the broken ends were dislocated, and the joint alignment was poor. Open reduction (OR) and screw fixation was used during the operation, and the patient recovered well at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The rarity and low radiographic appearance of displaced HMCF are easily overlooked and can eventually lead to nonunion HMCF, especially when radiographically difficult to visualize before age 5 years. Therefore, regardless of whether there are signs or imaging abnormalities in the growth process of adolescents, they should be vigilant, shorten the time interval for re-examination, and early detection and timely treatment can avoid some complications caused by this.

Treating multifocal humerus fractures: A comparison between the mipo technique and intramedullary nailing.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Proximal humerus fractures with metaphysodiaphyseal extension represent a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon due to their reduced incidence and the difficulty in the treatment decision. These can be treated with an intramedullary nail or using the MIPO technique, associating different advantages and complications depending on the procedure. The objective of this study was to compare metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with antegrade intramedullary nailing and those operated using the MIPO technique to see if there were significant differences in terms of functional, clinical, and radiological results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: retrospective, analytical and unicentric review of 29 patients with proximal fracture with metaphyseal-diaphyseal extension treated by MIPO technique and 33 patients surgically treated by antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) in our hospital from 2014 to 2020. Demographic, functional, radiographic and clinical data were obtained.. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between both groups in terms of fracture mechanism (p=0.34), fracture type (p=0.13) or Maresca classification (p=0.32). Surgical time was significantly shorter in the IMN group compared to the MIPO technique (p=0.014). No significant difference was observed regarding the need for blood transfusion (p=0.32). The mean consolidation in the MIPO group was 21 weeks compared to 21 weeks in the IMN, with no significant differences between both groups (p= 0.88). No significant differences were observed between CONSTANT test at one year in the MIPO group versus the IMN group (p=0.79), nor in radial nerve palsies (p=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Proximal fractures with metaphyseal-diaphyseal extension are a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon due to the infrequency, the complexity of these fractures and the fact that there is no established consensus on the ideal treatment for this type of injury. Both the MIPO technique with the Philos plate and the intramedullary nail are valid options for the treatment of these fractures, with no differences observed in terms of fracture consolidation time or in terms of functional results.

Treating AO Type C2-3 Distal Humerus Fractures With the Anconeus Flap Transolecranon Approach.

We evaluated the outcomes of precontoured locking plate fixation with the anconeus flap transolecranon (AFT) approach to treating AO type C2-3 comminuted intra-articular distal humerus (IDH) fractures among active patients. Thirty-six patients (age <65 years) with IDH fractures treated with precontoured distal humerus locking plate fixation were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n=18; transolecranon [TO] approach) and group 2 (n=18; AFT approach). The radiographic examination included assessments of implant failure, fracture site union, and olecranon osteotomy site union. Clinical examination included assessments of operating time, range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and complications. The mean follow-up time was 25.2 months (range, 18-79 months). The mean operating time was 134.3 minutes and was significantly longer for group 2 (AFT; 141.2 minutes) than for group 1 (TO; 124.2 minutes). The mean olecranon osteotomy site union time was significantly longer in group 2 (7.4 weeks) than in group 2 (4.0 weeks). Olecranon osteotomy site resorption occurred among 6 of 18 patients only in group 2. No significant difference in ROM (flexion, 130°; extension, -0.7°), MEPS (85.7 points), DASH score (20.0 points), or frequency of major complications (TO, 5; AFT, 6) was observed between the groups. Our results showed no advantage of the AFT approach over the TO approach, despite preserving the anconeus. Prospective randomized trials will be necessary to compare the AFT and TO approaches for treating comminuted IDH fractures. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):e326-e334.].